House of Prince

where content is king

  • Home
  • About Me
    • Books I Have Read
  • Blog
  • Contact

HOP Review: "Boy Short" Style Underwear*

June 26, 2008 Kim Tracy Prince 9 Comments

You’ve seen the pictures on the models and wondered “why? Why make “boy-short” underwear? And you’ve also wondered “What is the point?” And then you saw them in sales flyers and on Giselle and thought maybe you should get some yourself. It’s how every evil trend started, isn’t it?

I’m here to save you the time, money, and personal shame. Boy shorts suck. That’s why they’re FOR BOYS. Contrary to their well-marketed image, they are not slimming, nor are they chic. They are like granny panties with legs. They aren’t even useful, like Spanx. So put that catalog down, back away from the panty pile at Victoria’s Secret, and stick with your thong or your vanishing edge panty, because boy shorts will only make you hate your thighs even more.

It’s me, KTP, saving womankind, one panty at a time.
*They do NOT look like this on me. They do NOT look like this on human women unless those human women are like this model – starving and airbrushed and squatting like she really has to pee. Trust me.
This is an original post from www.kimtracyprince.com. Please don’t steal it.

Related Posts:

  • Forty Is the New Forty
    Forty Is the New Forty
  • "There's a Hole in the Soul of This Country"
    "There's a Hole in the Soul of This Country"
  • File Under "Creepy Kid Stuff"
    File Under "Creepy Kid Stuff"

General

Comments

  1. Kelli says

    June 27, 2008 at 2:35 PM

    Also? They ride up and give you a perma-wedge the minute you put them on.

    Reply
  2. Auntie Katie says

    June 27, 2008 at 4:07 PM

    I consider the boy-short underwear the very first item of fashion aimed solely at lesbians. I’m a fan.

    Reply
  3. Auntie Lisa says

    June 27, 2008 at 4:45 PM

    Seriously, funny. I love your comment that they only look like that on the starving, airbrushed model needing to pee. Comedy

    Reply
  4. KTP says

    June 27, 2008 at 6:00 PM

    Katie, what about Crocs? All other fans are collateral.

    Reply
  5. Nina says

    June 28, 2008 at 6:55 PM

    What about the boy short underwear without little legs? I like those! (Are those granny panties? Oh no!)

    Reply
  6. Auntie Katie says

    June 28, 2008 at 7:30 PM

    Have you ever worn Crocs? Crocs have the ability to transcend all boundaries… (cue dramatic music)

    Reply
  7. Julianne says

    June 30, 2008 at 10:53 PM

    A girlfriend and I were just talking about this very subject. Boy shorts don’t look good on anyone. Why they would make a boy short bathing suit bottom in a size 16 with horizontal stripes is mystifying.

    Reply
  8. suz says

    July 1, 2008 at 4:45 AM

    My sister actually loves them, but she has no but. I bought one pair, they don’t cover by bubble butt, and ride up in front and cut in my, hip/thigh area. I am with you, KTP!
    smb

    Reply
  9. Tina says

    July 7, 2008 at 6:21 PM

    I agree. I had one pair and they did give me the perma-wedgie Kelli referred to.
    I love these reviews. Keep em coming!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badgeShow more posts
About me and this 21-year-old blog
Who Are You?

Get House of Prince By Email:

Follow Me Around the Web

 Facebook Google+ Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest YouTube Instagram RSS E-mail

Otherwhere

  • aMintLife blog
  • aNotre Dame Magazine
  • DAME Magazine
  • Mom dot me
  • MomsLA

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Privacy Policy